Sign in or 

|
Posted Anonymously |
separation of Church and State
Nov 14 2008, 4:28 PM EST
The Church pulpit has become a political voice, and this defeat of Prop 8 is just the first of many to follow.This group should consider a more wide reaching agenda. If Churches are able to have a tax exempt status then they should stay out of politics. If they choose to preach to their congregations about Prop 8, fund the fight against Prop 8 with Church donations, it is time they paid their taxes, for they have become a political machine. From Mormons, Catholics, Evangelicals, this will not quit until this critical area is adressed. 11 out of 16 found this valuable. Do you?
Keyword tags:
Church
seperation of Church and State
taxes
|
|
Str8supporter |
1. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 17 2008, 10:15 PM EST
Attack "Church and State Separation", The Establishment Clause should be a tool we use to fight the encroachment of religious ideals and/or doctrines into government. Perhaps a concerted effort to stop the use of Sectarian prayers at City/County and State Council/Commission meetings will have an impact of giving them a taste of their own medicine. I live in Northern AZ and the LDS Church here is very strong in politics. Shutting down their prayers would hopefully have the impact of showing them "you get what you sow". The ACLU has already filed suits in many locations and the US Supreme Court has already ruled in favor of stopping these kinds of prayers. The city attorney here told the council that it is a "slam dunk" for their prayers to be stopped and made to be NON-Sectarian. A bunch of LDS and Catholic almost cried here because of a letter the city got asking them to stop with the fundamentalist "In Jesus Name" type prayer used in the invocations at the city council meetings. The establishment of religion clause means at least this: Neither a state nor the federal government may set up a church. Neither can pass laws that aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion... . Neither a state nor the federal government may, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/about.aspx?item=about_firstamd ACLU complaint form; http://www.acluaz.org/IntakeForm.pdf 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
jfermiller |
2. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 17 2008, 11:33 PM EST
Consider the implication to gay tax-exempts too...
1
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
conservativeidealist |
3. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 20 2008, 6:53 PM EST
"The Church pulpit has become a political voice, and this defeat of Prop 8 is just the first of many to follow.Let's set the record straight: No Church donations were sent to fund Prop 8, all donations were personal. It is also perfectly reasonable for a religious institution to espouse laws that are in keeping with its doctrine, morality is an indispensible part of politics. 2 out of 4 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
mattnic81 |
4. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 20 2008, 7:02 PM EST
"Consider the implication to gay tax-exempts too..."It depends on what kind of a tax exempt organization it is. The laws of involvement differ based on it's tax exempt classification. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
onthethirdday |
5. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 20 2008, 8:25 PM EST
"The Church pulpit has become a political voice, and this defeat of Prop 8 is just the first of many to follow.You are exactly right. I believe in accountablilty and as a (jack) fundamentalist I am willing to protest with all of you. But please hear this you must be careful about how it is done because I know pastors will point at any thing you all do and say "See! I told you! There persecuting us!" I won't have their sympathy but others may. However I believe (and so do pastors) in being held accountable for how the word of God is used, but doing so must be done responsibly, with maturity and respect or else the public opinion may side with the churches. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
theatreab |
6. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 20 2008, 9:24 PM EST
How do states get around the establishment clause? It is obvious what it says? Any feedback on this?
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Blaiden1 |
7. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 20 2008, 9:47 PM EST
Was not separation of Church and State started to keep the State from creating a Church that people were required to follow?Do not think it was in any way intended to keep God out of Government. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Spring_Haze |
8. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 20 2008, 10:00 PM EST
"Was not separation of Church and State started to keep the State from creating a Church that people were required to follow?History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes. -Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813. Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law. -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Blaiden1 |
9. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 20 2008, 11:09 PM EST
The 13 colonies cam here for religious freedom. Not for freedom without religion. Most communities were established with their specific religion. Yes, the constitution was designed to not include God, but that was in a mindset that most people would still uphold some sort of religion in their own way with a focus on God as it was in those days. Not to do away with God completely. The founding fathers used the Bible to help frame the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence."Whereas the Bible, the Word of God, has made a unique contribution in shaping the United States as a distinctive and blessed nation and people; Whereas deeply held religious convictions springing from the Holy Scriptures led to the early settlement of our Nation; Whereas Biblical teachings inspired concepts of civil government that are contained in our Declaration of Independence and the constitution of the United States; Whereas many of our great national leaders -- among them Presidents Washington, Jackson, Lincoln and Wilson -- paid tribute to the surpassing influence of the Bible in our country's development, as the words of President Jackson that the Bible is 'the rock on which our Republic rests'..." Public Law 97-280, passed on Oct. 4, 1982 "The Bible and its teachings helped form the basis for the Founding Fathers' abiding belief in the inalienable rights of the individual, rights which they found implicit in the Bible's teachings of the inherent worth and dignity of each individual. This same sense of man patterned the convictions of those who framed the English system of law inherited by our own Nation, as well as the ideals set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution." Ronald Reagan 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Blaiden1 |
10. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 20 2008, 11:12 PM EST
"The Church pulpit has become a political voice, and this defeat of Prop 8 is just the first of many to follow.Plus the tax exempt status comes with the understanding that the Priest or Preacher can not name a candidate for people to vote for. Church has always and will always have an influence on politics, it just has to be limited and used with common sense. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Spring_Haze |
11. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 1:15 AM EST
"The 13 colonies cam here for religious freedom. Not for freedom without religion. Most communities were established with their specific religion. Yes, the constitution was designed to not include God, but that was in a mindset that most people would still uphold some sort of religion in their own way with a focus on God as it was in those days. Not to do away with God completely. The founding fathers used the Bible to help frame the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.Andrew Jackson found no conflict between his religious views and his strong support for the institution of slavery; nor did he perceive any conflict with his support for the forcible relocation of Native Americans. In addition he believed that the Constitution required a strict separation of church and state. "I could not do otherwise without transcending the limits prescribed by the Constitution for the President and without feeling that I might in some degree disturb the security which religion nowadays enjoys in this country in its complete separation from the political concerns of the General Government." -- letter to the Synod of the Reformed Church of North America, 12 June 1832, explaining his refusal of their request that he proclaim a "day of fasting, humiliation, and prayer." -Andrew Jackson I won't even bother commenting on Reagan...I put him in the same league as Bush 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Blaiden1 |
12. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 1:23 AM EST
Really, Reagan in the same boat as Bush. Wow, that is a bold but stupid in my opinion that is, comment. Majority of people consider him the best President in the last 20 or 30 years.Anyway, it was definitely a different world then. Slavery, it was a horrible thing do not get me wrong. But they were sold to them, not much differently than a car is sold. The Africans that owned them in Africa, sold them, the biggest and strongest to be slaves. Their refusal of one religion was so that it did not impose on another religion. But religion and God was more important then than it is today I believe. The understanding of it has grown. We are not smarter than they were then, our intelligence is collective, we learn from what they did not know. Or so we should. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Spring_Haze |
13. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 1:31 AM EST
"Really, Reagan in the same boat as Bush. Wow, that is a bold but stupid in my opinion that is, comment. Majority of people consider him the best President in the last 20 or 30 years.Reagan's handling of the AIDS crisis was deplorable! History will not forget that...try reading Reports From The Holocaust. The Making Of An AIDS Activist by Larry Kramer. 2 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Blaiden1 |
14. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 1:43 AM EST
"Reagan's handling of the AIDS crisis was deplorable! History will not forget that...try reading Reports From The Holocaust. The Making Of An AIDS Activist by Larry Kramer."Is that all you got? Aids is a horrible thing, but it does not get spread easily. And I'm not about to be baited into a Aids and homosexuality discussion over a political thread. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2D6103FF932A25754C0A966958260&sec=&spon= 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Spring_Haze |
15. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 1:52 AM EST
"Is that all you got?I know how HIV is spread...and I know it is not only a homosexual disease. I am pointing out that Reagan's handling of the situation was horrible...notice that article referenced 1987 as the first year that statistics were available. This is how Reagan handled the AIDS epidemic http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/06/08/EDG777163F1.DTL 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Spring_Haze |
16. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 2:14 AM EST
Reagan and AidsBy Larry Kramer In response to Reconstructing Ronald Reagan (March 1, 2007) REAGAN & AIDS To the Editors: It is always distressing to read "upgradings" by academics and journalists more determined to recreate history in their own imaginings than in the facts that are available for honest consideration [Russell Baker, "Reconstructing Ronald Reagan," NYR, March 1]. Ronald Reagan may have done laudable things but he was also a monster and, in my estimation, responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler. He is one of the persons most responsible for allowing the plague of AIDS to grow from 41 cases in 1981 to over 70 million today. He refused to even say the word out loud for the first seven years of his presidency and when he did speak about it it was with disdain. He was, in the words of his domestic policy adviser, Gary Bauer, "irrevocably opposed to anything having to do with homosexuality" (personal communication with me in his White House office in April of 1983). As I write in my book The Tragedy of Today's Gays (Penguin, 2005), "I can locate no work of any urgency, or indeed, much work at all, on AIDS" during his entire presidency, thus allowing many millions of gay men all over the world to be exposed to the virus without so much as a warning from anyone in his government. Those of us on the front lines can attest to this stone wall that was unbreachable. It is laughable that Emerson, a possibly gay man himself, should be dragged in here. "Great flexibility of mind!" "Ability to adapt and embrace change!" Diggins and Arquilla have got to be joking. Larry Kramer New York City 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
mattnic81 |
17. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 7:26 AM EST
"The 13 colonies cam here for religious freedom. Not for freedom without religion."Religious freedom also encompasses the freedom to not have a religion. To deny that is just ignorance. 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Blaiden1 |
18. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 7:42 AM EST
""The 13 colonies cam here for religious freedom. Not for freedom without religion."Unfortunately you are right. But, the people who did inhabit the 13 colonies were religious, I wonder if someone actually worshiping Satan ever crossed their mind. So, what was Reagan supposed to do to single handed stop HIV from spreading to 69.9 million people? I am a big fan of Queen, but I'd never blame his death on Ronald Reagan. 0 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
mattnic81 |
19. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 7:54 AM EST
"Unfortunately you are right. But, the people who did inhabit the 13 colonies were religious, I wonder if someone actually worshiping Satan ever crossed their mind.So because the rights of homosexuals might never have crossed the minds of some people centuries ago does that mean we are not entitled to them now? And as for Reagan. His job was to face a crisis head on...not ignore it. In a time when the nation needed leadership, there was a deplorable lack there of. 1 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |