Location: Protest Chants

Discussion: separation of Church and StateReported This is a featured thread

Showing 21 - 40 of 54  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 | Next

Blaiden1
20. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 9:57 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 9:57 AM EST
I've never said gays should not have the same rights as married people. Just do not think they really considered it would be a topic down the road.

Yeah, but economy, Cold War the guy had a plate load already and he turned this country around. And no other President has done what he did.
People did not know what to do about homosexuality at that time. They knew gay men and drug users were getting sick and dying, but did not know what to do about it. I think they hoped people would take responsibility for their own actions and stop being stupid. But that will never happen, Government is the answer to all our problems these days, that is why Obama is President.
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Russ_and_Robert
21. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:04 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:04 AM EST
"The 13 colonies cam here for religious freedom. Not for freedom without religion. Most communities were established with their specific religion. Yes, the constitution was designed to not include God, but that was in a mindset that most people would still uphold some sort of religion in their own way with a focus on God as it was in those days. Not to do away with God completely. The founding fathers used the Bible to help frame the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

"Whereas the Bible, the Word of God, has made a unique contribution in shaping the United States as a distinctive and blessed nation and people;

Whereas deeply held religious convictions springing from the Holy Scriptures led to the early settlement of our Nation;

Whereas Biblical teachings inspired concepts of civil government that are contained in our Declaration of Independence and the constitution of the United States;
Whereas many of our great national leaders -- among them Presidents Washington, Jackson, Lincoln and Wilson -- paid tribute to the surpassing influence of the Bible in our country's development, as the words of President Jackson that the Bible is 'the rock on which our Republic rests'..." Public Law 97-280, passed on Oct. 4, 1982

"The Bible and its teachings helped form the basis for the Founding Fathers' abiding belief in the inalienable rights of the individual, rights which they found implicit in the Bible's teachings of the inherent worth and dignity of each individual. This same sense of man patterned the convictions of those who framed the English system of law inherited by our own Nation, as well as the ideals set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution." Ronald Reagan"
The Puritans did not come here not for religious Freedom. They came here to escape the persecution they were enduring in their own home country. Just as today....it isn't the Freedom of belonging to a religion that gets THE PEOPLE protection under the Constitution....the protections came into existance to protect the people from being persecuted for whatever one believes in.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    

mattnic81
22. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:10 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:10 AM EST
"I've never said gays should not have the same rights as married people. Just do not think they really considered it would be a topic down the road.

Yeah, but economy, Cold War the guy had a plate load already and he turned this country around. And no other President has done what he did.
People did not know what to do about homosexuality at that time. They knew gay men and drug users were getting sick and dying, but did not know what to do about it. I think they hoped people would take responsibility for their own actions and stop being stupid. But that will never happen, Government is the answer to all our problems these days, that is why Obama is President."
I think for a president to say he was too busy or had a lot on his plate is really a cop out. The welfare of our citizens should be a top priority. The point is....he didn't try to find out what to do about HIV. He didn't try. And as for "what to do about homosexuality," there is nothing to DO about it. LOL We aren't something that has to be handled. Homosexuality isn't a problem to be solved or some international crisis. We're a group of people. We're citizens of this world and we deserve to be treated as such....not referred to as an issue to be dealt with.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
23. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:10 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:10 AM EST
"The Puritans did not come here not for religious Freedom. They came here to escape the persecution they were enduring in their own home country. Just as today....it isn't the Freedom of belonging to a religion that gets THE PEOPLE protection under the Constitution....the protections came into existance to protect the people from being persecuted for whatever one believes in."
But, there were not many homosexuals being persecuted by the Church of England. It was the religious people who did not want to be taxed by England and forced to follow the Church of England. Yet, all of these protestant faiths use the Bible translated by England for the Church of England. It was about control over what people believed, most of them believed in God, but they did not want to be told how to believe in God. Had we not won the war against England, there is a good chance you would not be allowed to be gay and open about it right now. But who knows, that's just hypothetical.
0  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
24. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:14 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:14 AM EST
But, you know what, it does not matter. The original post was talking about how the Pulpit has become a political voice. Well a preacher can not endorse a candidate, but they have the freedom to talk about the issues just as much as anyone else. To tell a Church to be quiet is no different than telling a gay to be quiet. Pretty amazing when you call people a hypocrite and then turn around and without realizing it become a hypocrite yourself. 2  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    

mattnic81
25. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:19 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:19 AM EST
"Had we not won the war against England, there is a good chance you would not be allowed to be gay and open about it right now. But who knows, that's just hypothetical."
But we still really AREN'T allowed to be open about being gay. We risk being tied to fences in fields and beaten to death. Being beaten to death with fire extinguishers. Being beaten by police officers, shot in our cars. We risk being fired from our jobs. We can't serve in the military. The Catholic Church (I'm a Catholic) has created a litmus test for clergy. Gay men can't be any kind of donor (ie blood or bone marrow). We risk execution in some countries just for exhibiting any kind of hint of being gay.

So you see...if we want to be treated as equals we CAN'T be gay or be open about being gay. That's the point of this whole fight we're fighting right now.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
26. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:27 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:27 AM EST
"I think for a president to say he was too busy or had a lot on his plate is really a cop out. The welfare of our citizens should be a top priority. The point is....he didn't try to find out what to do about HIV. He didn't try. And as for "what to do about homosexuality," there is nothing to DO about it. LOL We aren't something that has to be handled. Homosexuality isn't a problem to be solved or some international crisis. We're a group of people. We're citizens of this world and we deserve to be treated as such....not referred to as an issue to be dealt with."
Yeah, well you know a lot about the role of the President sounds like. The States did not created the Federal government for the Welfare of the people. That was supposed to be their job. The President was to have a limited role in the everyday lives of people. but now we are a socialist government they are going to be everywhere. Federal health care, spreading the wealth, nationalization of companies hmmm sounds like europe to me. Stay out of my bedroom while I am promiscous or share needles, but give me your health care paid by other people and their money as well. Dont get my wrong, I went through a stage of promiscouity as well, and it could have ended bad for me and almost did. But I know the role of the Federal government unlike most people today.

Did not mean they did not know what to do about it in particular. But then ignoring it was the common response to it.
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
27. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:31 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:31 AM EST
"But we still really AREN'T allowed to be open about being gay. We risk being tied to fences in fields and beaten to death. Being beaten to death with fire extinguishers. Being beaten by police officers, shot in our cars. We risk being fired from our jobs. We can't serve in the military. The Catholic Church (I'm a Catholic) has created a litmus test for clergy. Gay men can't be any kind of donor (ie blood or bone marrow). We risk execution in some countries just for exhibiting any kind of hint of being gay.

So you see...if we want to be treated as equals we CAN'T be gay or be open about being gay. That's the point of this whole fight we're fighting right now."
You can serve in the military, you just cant be open about your sexuality. I served in the military, I did not want a gay man in the shower with me and 20 other guys, no different than 20 women want to take a shower with a guy. That makes sense. Only other way to do it is segregate gays from straights at shower time.
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Russ_and_Robert
28. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:40 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:40 AM EST
"But, you know what, it does not matter. The original post was talking about how the Pulpit has become a political voice. Well a preacher can not endorse a candidate, but they have the freedom to talk about the issues just as much as anyone else. To tell a Church to be quiet is no different than telling a gay to be quiet. Pretty amazing when you call people a hypocrite and then turn around and without realizing it become a hypocrite yourself."
It's soooo easy to put the kabosh on a conversation, when the misinformed post many rhetorically based opinions that an educated person can see right thru. The Puritans came here to escape and receive the protection FROM being persecuted period. The Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to belong to any religious organization...it ONLY extends the right NOT to be persecuted for whatever faith and belief they hold to. Your argument that not many homosexuals were persecuted by the C of E and others did not want to be taxed and thus forced to belong to the CofE. Clouding the issue with hypotheticals ain'gonna cut it!
Happy to hear you have such a great relationship with your friends and family.....must be nice.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

mattnic81
29. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:42 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:42 AM EST
"You can serve in the military, you just cant be open about your sexuality. I served in the military, I did not want a gay man in the shower with me and 20 other guys, no different than 20 women want to take a shower with a guy. That makes sense. Only other way to do it is segregate gays from straights at shower time."
You just proved my point...we CAN'T be openly gay. It's rather egotistical to assume just because you are a guy that we would want to look at you and are interested in you sexually. Talk about being stuck on yourself. Personally, I don't want to shower with anyone...so the question is...why are YOU ok with showering in a room full of naked men?

And as for segregation...oh yeah that's a fabulous idea. LOL. OY! Separate but equal is not equal. What's next...different sleeping quarters? Drinking fountains? OOO!! How about I sit in the back of the bus too! I wouldn't want my gayness to rub off on you.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
30. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:49 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:49 AM EST
"You just proved my point...we CAN'T be openly gay. It's rather egotistical to assume just because you are a guy that we would want to look at you and are interested in you sexually. Talk about being stuck on yourself. Personally, I don't want to shower with anyone...so the question is...why are YOU ok with showering in a room full of naked men?

And as for segregation...oh yeah that's a fabulous idea. LOL. OY! Separate but equal is not equal. What's next...different sleeping quarters? Drinking fountains? OOO!! How about I sit in the back of the bus too! I wouldn't want my gayness to rub off on you."
So it is egotistical for a woman to assume that a man wants to look at her in a shower?

BTW, in boot cam showering in a room full of people is the way it is done.
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
31. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:53 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:53 AM EST
"It's soooo easy to put the kabosh on a conversation, when the misinformed post many rhetorically based opinions that an educated person can see right thru. The Puritans came here to escape and receive the protection FROM being persecuted period. The Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to belong to any religious organization...it ONLY extends the right NOT to be persecuted for whatever faith and belief they hold to. Your argument that not many homosexuals were persecuted by the C of E and others did not want to be taxed and thus forced to belong to the CofE. Clouding the issue with hypotheticals ain'gonna cut it!
Happy to hear you have such a great relationship with your friends and family.....must be nice."
I have a great relationship with them, thank you. but that does not mean the road with them has not been bumpy. In order for me to tell them I did something wrong, or chose to do something they did not approve of, being agnostic for instance, I had to do it in a manner that would cause the least confrontation. I respected them way too much to dissappoint them to the extent that i would be banned from their household, my blood is more important to me than that.
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Russ_and_Robert
32. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 10:57 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 10:57 AM EST
"Let's set the record straight: No Church donations were sent to fund Prop 8, all donations were personal. It is also perfectly reasonable for a religious institution to espouse laws that are in keeping with its doctrine, morality is an indispensible part of politics."
if indeed morality is an indispensible part of politics....why do politicians lie so much and renege on promises given! Is that really a good argument.....aren't Judges appointed to the bench to dispel the untruths heaped on those that are small in number to rule on what they 'Believe' to be Right and just when appropriately held up to the light of our Constitution and in other instances strike down what is unfair and flat out wrong. Donations were sent personally from the heartfelt supporters of Prop 8.....admirable very admirable...
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

mattnic81
33. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 11:07 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:07 AM EST
"So it is egotistical for a woman to assume that a man wants to look at her in a shower?

BTW, in boot cam showering in a room full of people is the way it is done."
I know how it's done in boot camp. I'm not an idiot.

And well yeah...it is arrogant presumption to assume that a gay man is "checking you out." To assume that we want you just because you're a guy and we're a guy is just dumb. There is this assumption that gays are sex obsessed. And to suggest segregation...well all are signs of ignorance.

0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Russ_and_Robert
34. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 11:10 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:10 AM EST
"I have a great relationship with them, thank you. but that does not mean the road with them has not been bumpy. In order for me to tell them I did something wrong, or chose to do something they did not approve of, being agnostic for instance, I had to do it in a manner that would cause the least confrontation. I respected them way too much to dissappoint them to the extent that i would be banned from their household, my blood is more important to me than that."
What faith were you true to before you became an agnostic? How long were you an agnostic? Why did you choose Roman Catholicism? Please we are only trying to be civil and reach some common ground here. Getting to know you online in chat based forum is a long and tedious undertaking and one needs to protect oneself from modern day Sadducee's and Pharisee's. It is only fair to a establish a true rapport with those trying honestly to get a grip on the issues.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
35. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 11:23 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:23 AM EST
"What faith were you true to before you became an agnostic? How long were you an agnostic? Why did you choose Roman Catholicism? Please we are only trying to be civil and reach some common ground here. Getting to know you online in chat based forum is a long and tedious undertaking and one needs to protect oneself from modern day Sadducee's and Pharisee's. It is only fair to a establish a true rapport with those trying honestly to get a grip on the issues.
"
I was raised in a Church of Christ. A strict sola scriptura Church that does not even allow musical instruments, not even for a wedding. I was there until my late teens, sometime during my early-mid twenties I became agnostic and just did not care anymore.

I just started going to a RC Church. it was not really a decision I made, but more that I felt. I did it without even questioning what they preach, it was just something I felt I was being called to. I've never known a Catholic person my whole life, my town just got a Catholic Church a few years ago, and it is mostly hispanics.

I am 30 now, I was agnostic for probably the last 5 or 6 years of my life, probably one of my greatest sins I feel.
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
36. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 11:25 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:25 AM EST
"I know how it's done in boot camp. I'm not an idiot.

And well yeah...it is arrogant presumption to assume that a gay man is "checking you out." To assume that we want you just because you're a guy and we're a guy is just dumb. There is this assumption that gays are sex obsessed. And to suggest segregation...well all are signs of ignorance.

"
I see you avoided the relationship of being gay and taking a shower with same sex people, and being straight and taking a shower with the opposite sex.
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Russ_and_Robert
37. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 11:34 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:34 AM EST
"I was raised in a Church of Christ. A strict sola scriptura Church that does not even allow musical instruments, not even for a wedding. I was there until my late teens, sometime during my early-mid twenties I became agnostic and just did not care anymore.

I just started going to a RC Church. it was not really a decision I made, but more that I felt. I did it without even questioning what they preach, it was just something I felt I was being called to. I've never known a Catholic person my whole life, my town just got a Catholic Church a few years ago, and it is mostly hispanics.

I am 30 now, I was agnostic for probably the last 5 or 6 years of my life, probably one of my greatest sins I feel."
I see. So what you are saying, if i am getting this correctly is, you just felt like being RC without question because you had a feeling it was the right thing to be called toward....how come you were not drawn to the Jehovah Witness' or Islam or evem Judaism? Using 'Feelings' to justify one's beliefs aren't beliefs at all...they just remain cozy feelings based on unquestioning devotion from the outset.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Blaiden1
38. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 11:42 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:42 AM EST
"I see. So what you are saying, if i am getting this correctly is, you just felt like being RC without question because you had a feeling it was the right thing to be called toward....how come you were not drawn to the Jehovah Witness' or Islam or evem Judaism? Using 'Feelings' to justify one's beliefs aren't beliefs at all...they just remain cozy feelings based on unquestioning devotion from the outset."
No, no...I should have elaborated.

I grew up believing that Jesus had intended only one Church to be in existence, and I'm sure he knew that would not be the case. But anyway, the Church of Christ has no proven history of their existence, most Protestant Churches have come along in the past 200 years. The calling was coupled with the historical existence of the Catholic Church. If Jesus told Peter to create the Catholic Church, and Peter was givien the "what you bind on earth, will also be bound in heaven" authority then one can not argue with what the Pope says is a sin. My morals, my raising and my beliefs tell me this is the right way to go.
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Goombah
39. RE: separation of Church and State
Nov 21 2008, 11:44 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:44 AM EST
"Attack "Church and State Separation",

The Establishment Clause should be a tool we use to fight the encroachment of religious ideals and/or doctrines into government.
Perhaps a concerted effort to stop the use of Sectarian prayers at City/County and State Council/Commission meetings will have an impact of giving them a taste of their own medicine. I live in Northern AZ and the LDS Church here is very strong in politics. Shutting down their prayers would hopefully have the impact of showing them "you get what you sow". The ACLU has already filed suits in many locations and the US Supreme Court has already ruled in favor of stopping these kinds of prayers. The city attorney here told the council that it is a "slam dunk" for their prayers to be stopped and made to be NON-Sectarian. A bunch of LDS and Catholic almost cried here because of a letter the city got asking them to stop with the fundamentalist "In Jesus Name" type prayer used in the invocations at the city council meetings.

The establishment of religion clause means at least this:
Neither a state nor the federal government may set up a church. Neither can pass laws that aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion... . Neither a state nor the federal government may, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/about.aspx?item=about_firstamd

ACLU complaint form;
http://www.acluaz.org/IntakeForm.pdf




"
Great Post and right on the money! Lets hit back where it will hurt them the most LOST OF MONEY.
We are done with appeasment on this issue. If religious institutions are going to preach politics from the pulpit and tell people how to vote with lies and distortions then we need to fight back with every legal resource we have.
0  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Previous | 1 2 3 | Next